Starring
Charlton Heston, Edward G. Robinson, Leigh Taylor-Young, Brock
Peters, Chuck Connors, Joseph Cotten, Paula Kelly, Stephen Young,
Mike Henry, Whit Bissell, Dick Van Patten. Directed by Richard
Fleischer. (1973/97 min).
Essay
by D.M. ANDERSON
"Soylent
Green is peeeople!"
Everybody
knows that, just like everybody knows Darth Vader is Luke's old man,
Dorothy was only dreaming and Taylor has been on Earth the entire
time. So quoting the final line in Soylent Green - memorably
moaned by that master of subtlety, Charlton Heston - probably isn't
spoiling the party. It isn't like the time I was watching Planet
of the Apes on TV when I was 9-years-old and Mom came waltzing
into the living room to smugly announce, "You know it's really Earth,
right?"
What
the fuck, Mom?
I
didn't actually say that, of course, because I preferred my ass to be
welt-free. The funny thing is, she knew Planet of the
Apes' big twist without ever actually seeing the movie herself. That final image of the Statue of Liberty buried in sand became almost instantly iconic (without help from the
internet). From that point on, the only people shocked by the film's climax were those fortunate
enough to have seen it in 1968...and clueless nine-year-olds catching it for
the first time on CBS...hopefully without their spoiler-happy mothers lurking about.
Soylent
Green is not as culturally revered as Planet of the Apes,
though Charlton Heston was becoming cinema's apocalypse poster boy at
the time. The film isn't nearly as much fun, either. In 2022, the
world is severely polluted and overpopulated. While the wealthy
live in relative comfort in luxurious high-rise apartments
(complete with young concubines), most poor bastards dwell in crowded
squalor. Suicide, however, is an option. Anyone sick of life can simply show up
unannounced at their friendly neighborhood euthanasia clinic and peacefully end
it all.
Livestock
and crops are nearly non-existent and reserved for those who can
afford 150 bucks for a jar of strawberries. Everyone else lives off
of government issued crackers, Soylent Red, Soylent Yellow and
everyone's new favorite, Soylent Green. In fact, Soylent Green proves
to be so popular that people riot when food centers run out.
|
"Forget it, kid. I'm starting at QB today." |
Frank
Thorn (Heston) is a cop investigating the murder of a Soylent
Corporation bigwig, who was bludgeoned to death in his swanky
apartment. With the help of his researcher & roommate, Sol
(Edward G. Robinson, in his final film), the investigation leads him
to discover the Soylent Corporation's dark secret: the main
ingredient of those delectable crackers isn't soy at all, but people who've been processed through the euthanasia clinics.
Soylent
Green ain't exactly a feelgood film. In fact, it's downright
depressing at times, such as when Sol finally decides to cash-in at one of those clinics. That scene is even more poignant when
you realize Robinson was dying of cancer at the time. He and
Heston were friends, so their emotions during his deathbed sequence were genuine. Elsewhere, the film is aesthetically drab & grimy, the tone relentlessly downbeat and pessimistic, its environmental
message sobering. We're subjected to so much self-perpetuated human
misery that when the big twist is finally revealed, perhaps we really
aren't all that shocked.
Still,
"Soylent Green is people!" more-or-less immortalized
the movie, which has left its indelible mark on popular culture. For
over four decades now, it has been referenced, name-dropped and
parodied in countless films, TV shows and various other media.
There's a metal band that took its name from the title. There are numerous Soylent Green food & cocktail recipes. Yours truly even
owns a novelty t-shirt advertising Soylent Green cereal
("Now with more REAL PEOPLE in every bite!"). Neither my
wife or daughters have ever sat and watched the movie, but even they
know what Soylent Green is made of.
|
Extreme Hopscotch. |
But
getting back to the film itself...my pessimistic view of
human nature has me wondering if Thorn's discovery would
realistically make a difference. The film ends with Heston screeching
that immortal, meme-worthy line to the masses, the camera freezing on
his bloody, outstretched hand. This raises some troubling questions:
What next? Is the Soylent Corporation held accountable for their
awful secret? Does a shocked and outraged society rise-up against
them? And if all plant and animal life are already on the verge of
extinction, what are 40 million people in New York City alone
going to eat instead? And if Soylent Green itself is so deliciously addicting, would anyone really care what it's made of?
It's
possible people would be initially horrified, but I suspect
most would soon bury that knowledge, just like we currently do while
enjoying a hot dog. We've all heard horror stories and urban legends about McDonald's
ingredients...worm meat, animal brains, etc. But even after Morgan
Spurlock exposed the horrors of Value Meals in Super
Size Me, McDonald's remained the biggest restaurant chain in the
world because Quarter Pounders are still fucking awesome. Since
Soylent Green itself looks more like Sun Chips than it does our loved
ones, wouldn't most of us do the same, especially if the only other
option is starvation?
|
Thorn spots a relative. |
On
a related personal note, yours truly is a coffee junkie. Ever since becoming
addicted to it in college, I'm unable to constructively interact with
others without starting my day with a cup or six. As an educator in
the real world - of middle-schoolers, no less - I'm fairly confident
this magic elixir is the only thing that prevents me from becoming a
child murderer.
Starbucks, of course, is the evil Galactic Empire of the java-verse. For
the longest time, I managed to avoid its insidious allure, dashing
clear of the Starbucks in our Safeway parking lot, then juking like
Walter Payton to avoid the second
Starbucks inside the store. I thumbed my nose at franchise's hipster-baiting
trendiness and the idea of shelling-out five bucks for what's
essentially a glorified milkshake. I was also convinced most people
patronized Starbucks so others could see they patronized Starbucks.
After all, coffee is coffee. Anyone who needed whipped cream,
sprinkles, syrup and cookie straws weren't hardcore coffee achievers...just candy addicts. To my utter disgust, Starbucks' grande-sized
White Chocolate Mocha became my own wife's personal heroin. Worse
yet, like the drug-addicted parents we educators are required to
report to Child Services, she got our kids hooked on this shit, too.
Between
my family, co-workers, acquaintances and friends, I felt like a
single ship atop a sea of conformity, feeling superior the mindless
sheep willing to wait in a twenty-minute line for something you could get at 7-Eleven for half the price. Whenever I was
forced to feed my family's addiction by being the twelfth fucking car at
the drive-thru - nearly every weekend - a
small part of me wished the neighborhood euthanasia clinics in
Soylent Green were real.
Then
I received a Starbucks Christmas gift card from one of my students, who apparently assumed teachers must love Starbucks nearly as much as driving Toyota Priuses (you'd be surprised how many of my colleagues own one). I feigned gratitude with a polite smile while making a
mental note to drop her grade to a C-. My family was happy, of
course. For them, the only thing better than getting Starbucks while holiday
shopping was free Starbucks while holiday shopping. So one
weekend, card in-hand, we found ourselves in the nearest
twenty-minute line at one of our local mall's 17 Starbucks stores.
Being that I was exhausted from lugging around Old Navy bags and
it didn't cost anything, I caved-in and ordered myself a grande cup of their
strongest, darkest roast. "Would you like room for cream?"
the bubbly barista asked. Fuck, no.
|
Sometimes it's a texture thing. |
I
took my first sip, and despite scorching my tongue, the heavens
suddenly parted and the angels sang. This wasn't just coffee...this was nerve-jolting, eyeball-bursting COFFEE! Sweet ambrosia, where have you been my whole life? Even though I felt like I just joined the world's
largest cult, I became an instant Starbucks convert. Sure, I had always managed to brew a
decent cup o' joe at home, but it was mere Soylent Yellow compared to
this. Today, whenever my wife and I go anywhere, be-it the grocery
store or a trip to her mother's, our first stop is always the nearest
Starbucks. Someday, I hope to stop at the Starbucks in our Safeway
parking lot and pound-back a grande Dark Roast in time to order
another one when we get inside the store.
If
some nosey cop were to suddenly burst into the store with the ominous announcement that Starbucks' soaked its
coffee beans in the blood of children to achieve their delectable distinctiveness, I'm not sure how much I'd really care.
Sure, I'd be initially horrified because...you know, the blood of
children. But what am I supposed to do...revert back to
Folger's? The prospect of shitting a coconut has more appeal. Besides, it's not like I'd be drinking the blood my children.
|
Starbucks: Brewed with the blood of children. |
Additionally, if I were waiting in one of those
twenty-minute lines and the manager came out from behind the counter with a
bullhorn to announce, "The supply of Dark Roast has been
exhausted," I'd probably incite a riot that would make
the one in Soylent Green look like toddlers protesting naptime at a daycare facility.
Am
I alone? From my own personal experience, I doubt it. Maybe Soylent
Green's concept is actually more timely than we'd like to think. Sure,
as 2022 rapidly approaches, it doesn't look like we'll be ready
to make Grandpa part of our nutritious breakfast. But we might want to ask ourselves what horrors we'd be currently willing to accept in order to keep consuming the things we love.